Handicapping.com
Your Thoroughbred Racing Website Articles by Dave "Spotplay" Maycock |
|
|
This is a study to compare the various
final speed figures being used by many horse players today. The study points
out the various discrepancies among the various numbers. The numbers for
the last five races are listed for each horse. The numbers are staggered
back and forth to note improvement or decline, with higher numbers "moving"
to the right and slower numbers on the left. All races were run on July
30, 2000.
The idea of this study was to see just how the various public numbers compares. No testing was done on how ell these ratings did in predictingwinners. Take a look at the two horses that ran at Del Mar, You'll notice that when you compare the various numbers in terms of declining or improving form, the numbers more or less were the same, or followed the same pattern. The horse Wild'n Wet is a good example. His second race back was clearly not as good as the last race and yet this last race was still not as good as his third, fourth, and fifth races back. All four sets of numbers agreed right down the line on this horse. Now late a look at Hy de ose. This Canterbury horse has numbers shotgunned all over the place. Gee! I wonder who is right and who is wrong. Do you suppose that the second and third tier tracks get the same attention as the big tracks?? If you're going to be playing the smaller tracks, you might stronly consider just what speed ratings you use. Our research shows this study to hold up at nearly all the smaller tracks. Don't say you weren't warned. |